Thursday, February 19, 2009

Do not carry false rumors

Parashat Mishpatim of this weekly portion in Exodus 21:1-24:18 describes with much precision the laws and articles pertaining to justice, righteousness. Chapter 23 has some very appealing features. It deals with the respect and responsibility that should be exercised toward foreigners and enemies. "You must not carry false rumors; you shall not join hands with the guilty to act as a malicious witness. You shall neither side with the mighty (אחרי-רבים = acharei rabim = the multitude) to do wrong, you shall not give perverse testimony in a dispute so as to pervert it in favor of the mighty – nor shall you show deference to a poor man in his dispute." (Ex. 23: 1-4). "False rumors" = שמע שוא = shema shav »are things that are supposedly heard and reported, but not only that ! The Hebrew expression includes the fact that this slander or false allegations are heard and conveyed "in order to reduce to nil ». The phrase is special: "lo tisse shema shav\לא תשא דמע שוא" corresponds to something like "you shall not bear positive witness to what has been heard in order to exterminate, assassinate, reduce to nil". The root is "shav\שוא = shoah\שואה = reduce to silence, to nil, to exterminate". One way the humans have to wipe out without even paying any respect to anybody is to look blindly at those they want to destroy and annihilate. Thus, it is not possible to speak of "false, mistaken, erroneous" rumors or slander, words. In Yiddish, for instance "chap'n a shmu'es\כאפן א שמועות = to have a conversation". It is not so bad and describes with some humor a general tendency to blah-blah around. It always seems that chatting cannot really be bad or cause any serious damage. It is how things usually start. We always think we speak with much innocence. Russian thinkers have underlined that "every uttered word is a lie". This may be the consequence of some Scandinavian love for silence, developed in huge spaces and forests. It drifts to silence and every word has then a definite value and meaning. There is a Yiddish saying stating that "the tongue is smallest muscle yet it can kill". It is fascinating how words can lead to misunderstanding, inability to share when people desperately look for being connected. It is maybe one of our biggest defects at the present, though all societies have always been at pain in have authentic and supporting dialogues. But the prohibition, negative mitzvah is extremely strong, vehement. It is a commandment that strictly forbid any rumor, i.e. irresponsible gossiping, uncontrolled and bad speech about any other person. There is even more: this rule concerns our relationship with the others, the people who are different from us, do not belong to our "tribe, language, race, culture". It is the moral ethics applied toward foreigners and our enemies. Intriguingly, such commandments are usually considered as "Christian", but they are basically rooted in the Jewish universal awareness of what humans are responsible for. We do know that innocence should be preserved as far as possible before a person can be brought to the court in order to be granted a real judgment. The whole of our present Israeli society replies upon a system of permanent dribbled denunciation without proofs, evidence and trustworthy witnesses. As a consequence, many politicians and leading personalities are the victims of slanders. It does not mean they are totally and definitely innocent, but the social and media system just report them and "annihilate" their reputation. The system is international and shows everywhere because of some unbelievable power of false news, forged information, virtual or normal personal or collective attacks. Rumors can kill. They do more: they reduce to nil. What is the difference? There is a fundamental commandment "lo tirtzeach\לא תרצח = you shall not kill, murder". In the Ten Paroles, the commandment directly corresponds to the way we are called to worship and venerate God as the Creator of all the living. This is a real "face-to-face", "heart-to-heart" proof of authenticity for all human beings. The animals kill each other "without remorse". They need to find food and they seemingly try to survive. There maybe more in their destinies, indeed. But this is a programmed combat for some more days, months, years. Humans have been breathed in a soul, a spirit; we are inspirited. This means that we would be able to struggle for life but this can be portioned in two or more ways: there is a real struggle in the way we are living, against elements, environmental factors, economic and social realities. Humans can be wolves in their relationships, but they know how to control their moods and attitudes. On the other hand, the versatility of oral speech and the way it is carried and conveyed, persistently and swiftly, in very rampant and subtle manners, can only endeavor to do something that surpasses "simple" killing or murder. It is called in Hebrew "reduce to nil". This is the now famous root "shav/ shva- שו\שוא" that had been use for long in linguistics when a vowel disappears or "reduced to silent sound". The word is actually very well known and maybe too much in some way as determining "the Holocaust = the extermination of the Jews during World War II". "Too much known" in a special sense: the word is to be found in the psalms and shows up in many different verses of the TaNaKH. "Shahava, shehi\שחוא\שהי" means "wasteness, ruin" as in Targum Psalm 78:18. The radical tracks back to interesting notion of something that cannot be grasped, seized, stopped and disappears without leaving any material traces. The best example is "time = shahut\שהות", (not to be compared with "hour = shaah\שעה that on the contrary depicts time as an event that is made real and may even save, laasot/lehoshiya- לעשות\להושיע). There is a concept of "delay, delaying", something that tarries out anyhow. One of the best examples for "vacancy, inanity, falsehood" is found in the following statement: "I swear that I will eat this loaf and I swear that I shall not eat it" in which the former is the useless oath or vow, the second is a false oath (Shevuot 3, 9). In both cases the Talmud underlines that the person feels guilty for not accomplishing the oath either because he does not eat the loaf or he takes an oath that he will not implement. The matter is a real versatility and lack of responsibility in giving a word. This is why Jesus, in the Gospel, asked his disciples to refrain from taking oaths. In the Semitic tradition and cultural environment, words are like oaths, i.e. that they definitely link humans with their conscience, their awareness and responsibility in achieving something, which always link them to God. In this view, God is told to have His Word: "The Lord had sworn and He does not deny His saying/ does not "discomfort" His parole/ HaShem nishba ve lo yinachem\ה' נשבע ולא ינחם" (Ps. 110:4). Thus, rumors and gossip are comparable to "timeless delays" because time cannot be stopped and it disappears without leaving any traces of time-funded materiality. Words are still "materialistic and real" in the Semitic environment. "Davar\דבר = word, but also matter, object, thing". Long before recorders existed, the Semites had considered that sounds and words are as real as stones or visible elements. This is why silence is also made of unutterable sounds or still "unveiled" substances, just as the scrolls of the TaNaKh. This also makes the Gospel more dynamic and vibrant because the words it include can always be discovered in new ways. In Hebrew and Aramaic, "rumors" are linked to sounds and hearing. Thus it is a mixture of very special psychological and sociological attitudes: time cannot be controlled, but rumors can swiftly go back and forth; they open the field of impossible matters or purposes that can be substantiated although most people concerned are duly aware of the fact that their nature and consistency does not exist and thus does not allow any form of possible materialization. Instead of being true and really upon authentic facts and elements, rumors drizzle and wither because they are based on more than time that passes. When historical factors and events do exist, they are stored and can be interpreted in many different ways with regards to their backgrounds. Rumors are spread upon the basis of what is fancied from minuscule elements that suddenly turn to be real in some niches of our common imagination and aim to destroy what is usually a tiny source of life. Again let's take a statement: "It is vain (shav\שוא = a source of reduction to nil) to assert something that is known to be impossible, e.g. that we can see a camel flying in the air" (Shevuot 3:9-10). An oath that slowly destroys by reducing a matter of a subject to nil is a "shav - שוא" and therefore should be considered as a "shekerשקר = lie, false oath". "A vain prayer is a prayer that deals with a matter or a thing that cannot be changed" (Berachot 9, 3). This is a big concern for the Jewish tradition as well as for the Christian faith. "Nothing is impossible to God" (Gen. 18: 14; Luke 1: 37). Still, false rumors aim at denying the reality of various opinions, matters, existences, lifestyles and paths, what can truly be ascertained as real and extant. The paradox of life with God on based on something that only relies upon Divine Providence (Shechinah\שכינה) is that it cannot be proven regularly and requires a lot of time to be evidenced with some and then more and more certainty and precision. In this field, human nature often prefers to test and testing implies distrust and/or absence of trust or hope. It often the consequence of self-denial for some specific reasons. Faith and trust always require somehow to surpass our own mental "status quo". Hatred or alterity are natural orientations. People might protest and claim that this is not real. Indeed, our first human reaction is a sort of Kafka's "strach - touha" i.e. "attractiveness and repulsion". Franz Kafka was driven to personal despair. It might be more comfortable for most of the people to get drifted to such negative feelings. The way of faith, on the other hand, teaches how to get rid of such contradictory and nullifying tendencies. Traditionally, only miracles can change or even slightly alter the cause of false rumors and their consequences. The famous example in the Bible is given by Bilaam, the pagan prophet who was paid to exercise his competences by cursing Israel. On his way, his she-donkey gave him a kick and stopped. He fell twice ut could not understand what was going on (Numbers 22: 5 ssq.). The she-donkey had more insights with brains or any understanding of the matter than a professional prophet who simple was about to do his work. Finally, his "mind reversed" and he unintentionally started to praise Israel (Numbers 24: 5)with the words that continue to open the Jewish daily morning prayer: "How beautiful are your tents, Jacob, your dwellings, Israel!" It is significant that Israel's daily prayer starts with the words of a pagan, non-Jewish and cursing prophet who was sent to exterminate the House of Israel. Because Israel, as true believers do, does not exist for her sake and her pride. On the other hand, she shows God's loving-kindness and Finger in His actions to save and redeem. This is a major point that should draw us to humility and patience, keeping the non-judgmental line. The commandments is essential. It is most important at the present, although it might often be misinterpreted by the Jews and the non-Jews and other believers. Self-justification hardly allows to unfold common blindness. It often explains why pushy actions are required in numerous situations. Nonetheless, God gives a very fundamental commandment in the weekly "Mishpatim" portion: we ought to abstain to gossip or to carry false and exterminating rumors about ourselves and the others, whoever concerned. Foreigners, alien people are those whom we do not regard correctly. They may seemingly rebuke, oppose us or our egos, lifestyles, cultures, thoughts, traditions. There is a repeatedly mentioned commandment that is recalled by the Jews at Rosh HaShanah (New Year day in the Autumnal Feasts): "Do remember that your ancestor -Abraham - was a wandering Aramean" (Deut. 26: 5 = "a fugitive Aramean = ארמי אבד אבי = 'arami oved ani'") with somehow corresponds to the heralding Presence and decision of God (Genesis/Bereishit 4:12). It is not a question of cursing, it is not a punishment though many would continue to comment in this way. It encompasses the whole of the human call to enhance who humankind is as a God-interface partner throughout history. It is possible to get to the fulfillment of love, depth, breadth, length. In the present, we see how alteration can be powerful to threat human unity. There is a constant "back and forth" movement that goes from inclusion to total exclusion, attempts to love the others and some enemies and, on the other hand, to deny them and reject them till they are reduced to nil. The point is that "false - reducing to nil - rumors" do not require any killing or murder. The point is that rumors are comfortable when they slander and play the odious role of those who never touch the others. Or they come close to the aliens and then quickly fake to disappear. Rumors do not kill. They do not look face to face; the rarely face the enemy. This is why those who hate via the medium of rumors and false statements pretend they do not know of anything; or that they were told. Or that they need more evidence. We do not need to be member of any religious hierarchy to act that way. We just can click and connect on the computer and then report anonymously, remove and delete. It is more convenient! Simply for convenient. If people carrying gossips and false rumors could get a bit aware of what they do, they would consciously get ill and "out of order". It is a part of the long-term spiritual healing to allowing a societal curing of attitudes that cannot get out of our fancies. This is why Jesus is told to get away from the region where he cast the swines down the mountain into the sea (Matthew 8:32). The mental aspect is essential and makes a spiritual conflict that should be healed. Rumors are not materialized and they need to remain in such a stand. Otherwise they would be destroyed very quickly. On the other hand, rumors need to sound credible though human minds could admit they are false. This would be a source of discomfort. Thus, rumors exist to pour out the poisoning wickedness that our brains cannot suppress in a natural way. This is also why there is a great sense of responsibility shared by God in the giving of His Mitzvot. He is convinced that, in the end, the humans will be able to overcome their passions and irrationalities. A famous rabbi was asked by a so-called talented student how he could be ordained a rabbi? The answer of the Sage was that he should learn the Shulchan Aruch (The Prepared Table) and its five books. The student immediately corrected and proudly declared: "There are only four books in the Shulchan Aruch!" The tzaddik replied: "Not at all! There are indeed four books that are written, but there is a fifth volume that is more important and not written down: "sechel\שכל = discernment, capacity to have brain and judge without judging". It takes a lot of time and we are not patient. The commandments given this week are definitely essential because they show that God trusts in human beings. He has sworn that He will not try to destroy the world. The question is pending: why do we continue to slander? Maybe because we are lightminded. We did not reach the Gates of death to widely boomerang around the power of life. av aleksandr [Winogradsky Frenkel] February 19-6, 2009 - 25 deShvat 5769 - כ"ה דשבט תשס"ט

Monday, February 16, 2009

With all your money

How to continue to describe the parallels that exist between Judaism and Christianity in the organization of their communities? It should normally be time to depict the various functions and their backgrounds that are really intriguing and totally unknown. Christians took many aspects of their structures from Judaism which pattern them on ancestral connections with the Sumerian and Egyptian traditions with some local influences found among the pagan people in the Land of Canaan, but also in the Sinai and today's Jordan, Arabia as well as the Greek and Persian cultures.

The weekly reading portion includes the first special reading "Shekalim\שקלים" that we read in Shemot/Ex.30:1-16. So it might be time to speak "money", not only: our way to understand what it means to use money? all kinds of money, financial actions and transfers, assets, bank accounts, pockets, magnetic and virtual money exist. They are a full part of our spiritual and ethical activity governed by the Torah and the Mitzvot.

We live in a country, a region and a cultural area where it is normal, for various reasons, to check the rates of currencies all the day long. Along with this constant checking and rating, the Jewish tradition requires that every Jew recite three or four times the "Sh'ma Yisrael\שמע ישראל - Hear, Israel" (Devarim/Deuteronomy 6:4-10) which states: "Hear Israel, the Lord is our God, the Lord is One ( Echad-אחד = alone, only One). You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart (bechol levavcha\בכל לבבך = whole-heartedly - spirit and body) and with all your soul (uvchol nafshecha\ובכל נפשך = life, existence, being) and with all your might (uvchol meodecha\ובכל מאדך = plus, surplus, very being, human being). It is definitely not easy to translate this text into any tongue. “Levav\לבב” also deals with our conscience, heart but as nurturing blood to our brains and allowing to think, elaborate, speculate (good for money). It is a sort of twofold heart that sustains the major pipe organ that beats in our chests and our feelings, minds, reflections.

“Nefesh\נפש” refers to our soul (rofe nafshi\רופא נפשי = psychiatrist in Modern Hebrew), but it is restrictive because it encompasses the whole of our being, existence, considering that our bodies and physical shapes are also a part of the soul that abides in our skulls). Then, “uvchol meodecha\ובכל מאדך” vitalizes and energizes what firstly is determined as our “levav\לבב” and “nefesh\נפש”. Money is the dynamic creative factor that activates socializing capacities to “incorporate = embody” and structure civilization and relationships by means of economic resources, called “me’od” in the mitzvah.

Interestingly, the “Sh’ma Yisrael\שמע ישראל” is cited by Jesus in the three synoptic Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke (Matthew. 22:34-40/ Mark 13:28-31/Luke 10:25-28/, always in a context of questions asked by Sadducees, Scribes (they did not believe in the resurrection, nor the Oral Law) or testing Jesus about “eternity – the world-to-come”. The Greek version of the Gospel adds “and wit hall your spirit/pneuma” because the Indo-European language and culture require exact precisions predetermined and obvious in Hebrew.

But the point is that every human being does live in a consciously developed and existing economic system. We all live in a money cash flow society that is highly sophisticated in the present. Thus, whoever we are, and whatever our opinion about the subject, we use and participate to monetary ups and downs, prosperity, wealth and crashes. No one can pretend to be excluded from any money system, i.e. a valuation, trading, purchases and sales, profits or loss. Now, pets are a part of this system, but a long-hair Tel Aviv Dizengoff Street or beach greyhound, a Husky in Beersheva, poodles, cats, birds, Guinea pigs or parrots, donkeys and camels can be “very so much” and parade for our pleasure. They cannot be the “me’od\מאד” (very much being) as humans are, sometimes against their will. They can’t sell each others, buy their pet food or even barter. Humans do trade humans and this wild attitude is exhibited everywhere.

Each of us has a certain value; and even a zero valuation or a minus shows our rate. This estimation daily affects un/under/employment networks that are virtually expanding through the web. Thus, there is little difference between the penniless Arab hired daily on the road for some odd and dangerous unsecured work and any executive, business, manager or top-ranking specialist that can be hired and fired by supply and demand fancies. Highly handicapped people who hardly can walk and, e.g. work for repairing furniture – a heavy physical task for them paid at minimum expenditures – are a part of this system.

This is indeed a real spiritual and theological question. Faith includes that we receive and give back all that we possess in cash, money, properties, assets and there is no way to hide them under beds (as many sick people do in elderly homes or when staying at the hospital). God can see till under a bed. The thing is that most spiritual communities, any faith or structure feel a sort of discomfort toward money. They would naturally be inclined to rob any institution for the sake of the Most High, provided they could not loose a farthing = a fourth of a penny.

It is obviously easier to accept to love God with all our heart and soul, while we are fresh and rather at ease. Israel has always been a collectivity showing a lot of mutual support. The poor and the needy could be at times looked at with some reluctance, but they are a part of the way we totally trust in God. Because a Jew does know that economics are sound, can be healthy and save people. Jews can feel as repelled and ashamed as some Christians or cultures about money. Curiously, their “obligation” to work with money along the ages helped them get deep into a firsthand and exhaustive understanding of human life dignity as revealed by the Torah and the Mitzvot. Money, cash, assets are indeed as changeable and whimsical as human souls.

In English, “money” comes from Fr. “monnaie”, It. “moneta” that tracks back to the Roman goddess “Juno” in whose temple money was coined. It is quite possible that the word is linked to (ad)monere (to suggest, warn) that gave “monitor”, i.e. “to make the good choice, go the right way. Germ./Dutch “Geld” is connected with of “Gültigkeit – validity” of the money as coin, then as paper (banknotes). Scandinavian as Slavic turn around “penningar” and “pinianzy” cf. “penny”). In the Antiquity, “Talent” was a measure of weight and money that started to be used for abilities and capacities, human aptitudes. In English colloquial, “coins, dough, bread, lolly, gelt, readies” have equivalent in most languages. Slang “Mazuma” comes from Yiddish “mezum’n-מזומן = Heb.: “mezuman-מזומן/cash”.

The normal Jewish attitude was written in a shop in Pelikaansstraat (Antwerp-Belgium) some years ago: “men nemt alle gelt un tzolt mezum’en\מען נעמט אלע געלט און צאלט מזומן – we accept all currencies and pay cash”. In Israel, people can get wild for kessef\כסף (Hebrew) or massar (Arabic) and speak of it all the time. It is a part of the Israeli socializing culture to check any bill (cheshbon\חשבון) and even to argue till the last shekel. Is it a sort of lack of trust? Aramaic and Hebrew word “arnak\ארנק” (purse) is found as “arnaka\ארנקא = membrane of the brains = money-bag” (Bava Bathra 8a) and “arnaki\ארנקי = merchant’s neck hanging coin bag” (Kiddishin 1,61a). It became “arnaquer = to rob and cheat” in French.

Hebrew “cheshbon\חשבון” (bill, account) is interesting to understand the spiritual impact of money on our beings and personal, private attitudes toward ourselves and the others. Money obliges us to “chashav i.e. both ‘to count, calculate’ and ‘to think, meditate’. “Cheshbon-nefesh\חשבון-נפש” should be the daily meditation and review of the day that we have to do before going to sleep.

Now, the Hebrew word “kessef\כסף = silver”, originally a “Meah\מעה = a piece equal to 1/6th of a denar. The usual example about Kessef is Kiddushin 1,1 which states that a man can acquire a woman by giving her an amount of money that she would accept. It is positive. No bargain or woman on sale. On the contrary, she determines if the money corresponds to her value or shows that the man is acceptable as permanent life partner. In Yoma 4,41a, it is said: “The Land of Israel was divided by three methods: by lots, by the Urim and Turim (priestly breast plate prophecy) and according to the value of property.”

Money rates line with utopia. This shows how inconstant we are today. For example, the value of the European currencies basically remained unchanged from the Congress of Vienna in 1815 till the outburst of World War I in 1914. Since then, all societies and cultures went through dramatic and unstable review of all their parameters and money is rather “floating”. “me’odecha\מאדך” is considered in a special way by the Talmud: “Whatever measure he may measure out to you, give thanks to him, very-very much” (Berachot 9,5). This substantiates what God saw, when He achieved the work of creation and the shaping of ADaM\אדם that humans are called to be “very-very much\מאד-מאד”, not “too much”, just “very human” in producing and sharing. “Me’od\מאד” is written with the same consonants as ADaM in Hebrew.

As a rule, women are underpaid in most countries. Providence may be a Name of God, still it requires a lot of faith even if it is a basic spiritual experience. Today, money often appears to be virtual. Just as some kids might never have seen a corn field but only pop corn boxes, people are lost by misusing their credit cards that mutate in their minds to debit sheets and true overdrafts. In fact, money is beyond any worth and this maybe misleading for some people at a psychological level.

Jesus and the Gospel often use money as parables. The “talents” appeared in this saying: a master gave 5 talents to one, 2 to another, 1 to a last servant who put it into the earth. The others got interests from their banks. So the master decided to take this unique talent and to give it to the first servant. “For everyone who has, more will be given and he will grow rich; but from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away.” (Matthew 25:14-30). The phrase has to be understood as a spiritual link between money, faith and being.

On another occasion, Jesus was in the Temple, sitting opposite the treasury. Many rich people put large sums. A poor widow also came and put two small coins. Jesus said: “this poor widow put more than all the other contributors… for they gave from their surplus wealth, but she from her poverty” (Mark 12:41-44), i.e. her full trust in God’s Providence.

We will soon be en route through wilderness. Thus, when reading portion “Shekalim”, while training for penance during the Great Lent, this parable of Jesus that fits so much with our attitude in society: “What woman having ten coins and losing one, would not light the lamp and sweep the house searching carefully until she finds it? Having found it she calls her friends to rejoice. In the same way, there will be rejoicing among the angels of God over one sinner who repents.” It means for everyone who turns back to God (la’assot teshuvah לעשות תשובה, answer to Him; “metanoia” in Greek : correct one’s mind, conscience”) to get to the spiritual insights how to love God to the fullest.

av Aleksandr [Winogradsky Frenkel]

February 16/3, 2009 – 22 deShvat 5769 - כ"ב דשבט תשס"ט



Sunday, February 15, 2009

St. Modomnoc O'Neil and the Bees


By Denny Sellen, Eastern Orthodox Christian based in Seattle
(Specialist in Semitic Anthropology and Compared Religions)

Since the first time I read this story, it has made a great impression on me. The Celtic saints, in particular those of Ireland, have always exhibited a keen connection with the world of nature, with which they felt no duality, but rather perfect harmony. They saw the natural world as being at the forefront of redemption and the grace of God as being able to work through even the violent-natured of animals. This story is an example of the lovely the Celtic saint had for animals, and, more over, the love those animals had for them. We cannot forget the stories of modern day saints and their animal friends, such as Saint Seraphim of Sarov who had a bear that lived with him (whom he had met when it was an adult), or Fr. Paisios of Mount Athos (d. 1995) who according to countless witnesses had a supernatural ability to communicate with animals and even became sadened when a visitor killed a snake.


St. Modomnoc O'Neil, Bishop
(Domnoc, Dominic, Modomnock)
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
Died c. 550. Modomnoc, descended of the Irish royal line of O'Neil, had
to leave Ireland to train for the priesthood, since he was a student
before the creation of the great Irish monasteries. His name is most
likely to have been Dom or Donogh but the Celtic saints were so tenderly
loved that "my", "little" and "dear" were very often added to the names,
which completely altered their appearance. Another disciple from Ireland
much loved by St.David was originally called Aidan, but usually appears
in accounts of the monastery as Maidoc.

He crossed the English Channel to be educated under the great Saint
David at Mynyw (Menevia, now Saint David's) Monastery in Wales. All
those who resided in the community were expected to share in the manual
work as well as the study and worship, and there is a story which tells
how one day Modomnoc was working with another monk making a road, when
he had occasion to rebuke him for some matter. The other monk was seized
with anger and took up a crowbar, but before he could bring it down on
Modomnoc, SaintDavid, who was witness to the incident, stayed his arm by
his spiritual powers and it remained paralysed.

Modomnoc was given charge of the bees and he loved it. And so did
everyone else--they all loved honey, but few like taking charge of the
hives. Modomnoc liked the bees almost more than he liked their honey. He
cared for them tenderly, keeping them in straw skeps in a special
sheltered corner of the garden, where he planted the kinds of flowers
best loved by the bees.

Every time they swarmed, he captured the swarm very gently and lovingly
and set up yet another hive. He talked to the bees as he worked among
them and they buzzed around his head in clouds as if they were
responding. And, of course, they never stung him.

At the end of summer, they gave him much honey, so much that Modomnoc
needed help carrying it all inside. The monks never ran out of honey for
their meals or making mead to drink. The good Modomnoc thanked God for
this, and he also thanked the bees. He would walk among the skeps in the
evening and talk to them, and the bees, for their part, would crowd out
to meet him. All the other monks carefully avoided that corner of the
monastery garden because they were
afraid of being stung.

As well as thanking the bees, Modomnoc did everything he could to care
for them in cold and storm. Soon his years of study ended, and Modomnoc
had to return to Ireland to begin his priestly ministry. While he was
glad to be returning home, he knew he would be lonely for his bees. On
the day of his departure, he said good-bye to the Abbot, the monks, and
his fellow students. Then he went down to the garden to bid farewell to
his bees.

They came out in the hundreds of thousands in answer to his voice and
never was there such a buzzing and excitement among the rows and rows of
hives. The monks stood at a distance watching the commotion in wonder,
"You'd think the bees knew," they said. "You'd think they knew that
Modomnoc was going away."

Modomnoc resolutely turned and went down to the shore and embarked the
ship. When they were about three miles from the shore, Modomnoc saw what
looked like a little black cloud in the sky in the direction of the
Welsh coast. He watched it curiously and as it approached nearer, he saw
to his amazement that it was a swarm of bees that came nearer and nearer
until finally it settled on the edge of the boat near him. It was a
gigantic swarm--all the bees from all the hives, in fact. The
bees had followed him!

This time Modomnoc did not praise his friends. "How foolish of you," he
scolded them, "you do not belong to me but to the monastery! How do you
suppose the monks can do without honey, or mead? Go back at once, you
foolish creatures!" But if the bees understood what he said, they did
not obey him. They settled down on the boat with a sleepy kind of
murmur, and there they stayed. The sailors did not like it one bit and
asked Modomnoc what he intended to do.

He told them to turn the boat back for Wales. It was already too far for
the bees to fly back, even if they wanted to obey him. He could not
allow his little friends to suffer for their foolishness. But the wind
was blowing the boat to Ireland and when they turned back, the sail was
useless. The sailors had to furl it and row back to the Welsh coast.
They did it with very bad grace, but they were too much afraid of the
bees to do anything else.

Saint David and the monks were very surprised to see Modomnoc coming
back and looking rather ashamed. He told them what had happened. The
moment the boat had touched land again, the bees had made straight for
their hives and settled down contentedly again. "Wait until tomorrow,"
advised the abbot, "but don't say farewell to the bees again. They will
be over the parting by then."

Next morning, the boat was again in readiness for Modomnoc and this time
he left hurriedly without any fuss of farewell. But when they were about
three miles from the shore, he was dismayed to see again the little
black cloud rising up over the Welsh coast. Everyone recognised the
situation and the sailors turned back to shore immediately.

Once more the shamefaced Modomnoc had to seek out David and tell his
story. "What am I to do?" he pleaded. "I must go home. The bees won't
let me go without them. I can't deprive you of them. They are so useful
to the monastery."

David said, "Modomnoc, I give you the bees. Take them with my blessing.
I am sure they would not thrive without you. Take them. We'll get other
bees later on for the monastery."

The abbot went down to the boat and told the sailors the same story. "If
the bees follow Modomnoc for the third time, take them to Ireland with
him and my blessing." But it took a long time and a great deal of
talking to get the sailors to agree to this. They did not care who had
the bees as long as they weren't in their boat.

The abbot assured the sailors that the bees would give no trouble as
long as Modomnoc was onboard. The sailors asked, if that were so, why
the bees did not obey Modomnoc's command to return to the monastery.
After much back and forth, the sailors were finally persuaded into
starting out again.

For the third time the boat set sail, Modomnoc praying hard that the
bees would have the sense to stay in their pleasant garden rather than
risking their lives at sea. For the third time he saw the little black
cloud rising up in the distance, approaching nearer and nearer until he
saw it was the same swarm of bees again. It settled on the boat once
more. This time it did not turn back. Modomnoc coaxed his faithful
friends into a sheltered corner of the boat, where they remained quietly
throughout the journey, much to the sailors' relief.

When he landed in Ireland, he set up a church at a place called Bremore,
near Balbriggan, in County Dublin, and here he established the bees in a
happy garden just like the one they had in Wales. The place is known to
this day as "the Church of the Beekeeper."

He became a hermit at Tibberaghny in County Kilkenny and some say he was
later consecrated Bishop of Ossory(Benedictines , Curtayne).

Troparion of St Modomnock tone 4
Pomp and splendour held no attraction for thee, O Father Modomnock./ By
leaving the glitter of the world, thou didst freely embrace thy poverty
with the Waterman,/ praying for the salvation of all faithful souls.

Kontakion of St Modomnock tone 7
Retiring from the company of men,/ thou didst serve God in solitude, O
Father Modomnock,/ and thy Father, seeing thy virtue in secret,/
rewarded thee openly./ Therefore we glorify thy name/ and praise and
bless thy righteous memory.

Friday, February 13, 2009

Bone clutching and eternity

"To wed or not to wed?" What does it mean to enter into a marriage and what for? How can we, both with regards to Jewish and Christian rites, match today in Israel with the first stated mitzvah/commandment: "p'ru ur'vu umil'u et haaretz\פרו ורבו ומלאו את הארץ - be fertile, and increase and fill the earth and master it"? (Ex. 1:28). After God fashioned the rib (or "side - tzela'") into a facing-up help and soul-mate for Adam (ezer kenegdo\עזר כנגדו), it is said: "Hence a man leaves his father and mother and clings to his wife (be'ishto\באשתו) so that they be "bassar echad\בשר אחד = one, one flesh, one good prophetic announcement" (Bereishit. 2:24).

It should be noted that Jesus refers and underscores this commandment, which is also a right, as, citing the verse, he added: "So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, no human being must separate." (Matthew 19:5; Mark 10:7, that continues about divorce).

The "Ten Paroles/Divrot-דיברות" considers the matter by means of a prohibition: "lo tin'af\לא תנאף - You shall not commit adultery" (Shemot 20:13), though the midrash explains that "God strongly sneezes out of furious anger (Heb. "af\אף" (Midrash Shemot Rabba 20,3).The real purpose maybe stressed by Paul of Tarsus who cites Genesis 2:24 and concludes: "This is a great mystery" (Ephesians 5:32); the apostle means a mystery of connection between God and His Kahal (Community). His views about Jesus are thus important in this context because it shows that Christianity fully took up the Jewish tradition for which "marriage, wedding, match, betrothal" are the key and utmost vital mark of holiness between humans and, indeed, called "kiddushin\קדושין - sanctifications"

Now, we live in the State of Israel. There is no civil marriage in the country. Thus, this creates a new form of spiritual interrogation (sheilah\שאלה) that lines with the week portion Yithro and the appointment of the first justices (shoftim – Shemot 18:13-16) as suggested to Moses by Yithro, seemingly according to a natural Law or morals (Derech Haaretz\דרך הארץ). The paradox we face is that the whole Jewish tradition emphasizes the importance to get married, establish a family, have children and see the children of their children… in a legal way that also replies upon a strict and very developed understanding of the status and role of women. Say that marriage is a must, a blessing and that divorcing (get\גט= divorce bill) would deeply affect every partner. The Talmud states that it causes God to weep upon His heavenly altar (Gittin 62b) because the only thing He is doing since He created the world is to marry people. The problem is that in Israel, there is no majority to accept to be married by the Orthodox Rabbinate.

Nu-nu… Or they may not be able to go through the procedures. An Israeli citizen or a pious Jewish person may totally belong to the children of Israel and still not be recognized by the Rabbinate. Then, the Orthodox Rabbinate is the only body to be legally entitled to perform weddings and deliver the required ketubah\כתובה (certificate of marriage). Generations of North American people would not be able to show their ancestors' ketubot as the people from the former Soviet Union. In the former USSR, "being a Jew" was a "nationality" that often showed to be in full contradiction with the real origin of the person. Anyone could simply be declared as a Jew because of their paternal or maternal line. The Law of Return accepts civil marriage certificates. But very few were married under the chupah\חופה – canopy and as "Jews, officially recognized by the Rabbinate". Local sabras, born in the country, or people who were raised here, often prefer to travel abroad or contact some authorized foreign delegations (embassies). In some cases, this raises very serious cultural problems with psychological identity interrogations: whatever statistics, it is evident that a lot of non-Jews, people of any faith arrived and settled in Israel in the past 60 years.

During the war in some parts of Central Europe and Balkans, a lot of newcomers arrived showing documents of some parents or relatives who had lived some time in Israel in the 50es, then left back to their home countries. In case, they had both Jewish and Christian documents. Biographies can be absolutely amazing and it often appears that people are all together Jewish, Christian and Muslim, i.e. legally, according to the right of the concerned denominations. This chidush\חידוש/new unique aspect of the Israeli society shows how terrific, wild and off-the-wall we are in a civilization that develops its energetic socializing capacities. There is another hint: people can get married abroad in any legal country – and then renew many times the same manifold marriage-divorce process in the officially recognized Christian Churches or at some Islamic Courts. Yes, many people are legally compelled not to marry or to cope with problematic lawless give-and-takes.

This is the legal identity dash. There is also the individual clue. In the new-old State of Israel, wandering Jewishness often turned to risky and gambling sort of adultery journeys or settlements. They grow because of the general hedonistic tendency to selfishness and loneliness. Stability requires a lot of efforts in matching with the special one. This is a long-term experience. Now, the real touch is love. Not desires of any kinds, but to make these efforts for the sake of love. And not necessarily because two got damned crazy about each other, share common views or interests as also their families. There is more: to love because God can match two persons. Say we don't relate to gays and lesbians right now in this blog. It is true that any marriage is firstly a partnership with God. At least, it may lift up and inspire even those who would be deceived by any clerical administration. It happens too often.

I discussed with a woman and her daughter. She told me she was not Jewish. Her daughter was cool about going to the Army. The mother, a physician, was divorced. She suddenly asked: "What is more important: to be Jewish or non-Jewish, or is there more?" I said: "Love is more important than anything". She got very surprised and agreed.

The Jewish marriage is short: a) Kiddushin\קידושין (Sanctifications) are immediately followed by the nissu'in\נשואין (marriage under canopy).Talmud Kiddushin 1:1 states that the woman can be married (acquired/qanah) by receiving some value – or a contract (the Ketubah is a part of the marriage today) or by having sexual intercourse with the man. Thus, during the Kiddushin, the woman does not say anything, doing more in accepting her husband. The Kiddush\קידוש and cup of wine reminds: "Your wife shall be a fruitful vine within your house, your sons like olive saplings around your table" (Psalm 128:3). The bridegroom puts a ring on his bride's index and says: "at mekudeshet-מקודשת/ you are consecrated to me by this ring according to the Law of Moses and Aaron". Interestingly, "mekudeshet-מקודשת/being consecrated" points out, in return, that the woman blesses and brings "some sanctifying abilities" to her husband. Curiously enough, the Eastern Orthodox marriage service has about the same words. In Bessarabia-Romania, some Christian Orthodox rituals, in the 19th century, included the Hebrew word said to the bride, showing a strong ritual proximity (when the bridegroom gives the ring to his bride).

In the Jewish tradition, the whole service recalls that the "chatan\חתן – bridegroom" is welcomed by his wife, as entering the Temple (Mikdash): "Ve'ani berov chasdekha\ואי ברוב חסדך (and I with Your abundant love) avo veytecha\אבוא ביתך (enter Your house)" (Psalm 5:8). Then, she is given the Ketubah/bill of marriage ("writ") that is strictly legal and aims to protect her financially in case of a divorce. A second cup of wine is given with seven blessings about, God's glory, man's fashion, the barren (ekeret\עקרת) fertility, children and the return to Jerusalem (Jeremiah 33:10-11) climaxing in the full jubilation (10 different words) of the new "one flesh" (Isaiah 62:5) as each marriage restores this unity of joy between Adam and Eve (Tractate Bava Bathra 75a). Thus, "chatan\חתן = to covenant, tie, be connected, protect" means "bridegroom" who "by his fructifying rain" (Berachot 59b), gladdens his "kallah\כלה = fulfillment help-mate", contrary to "ba'al\בעל" (husband) who exercises apparent power (Taanit 6b). The cup of wine is then broken, which is usually a memorial of the Temple destruction.

Judaism insists, on Shabbat eve that the husband praise his "eshet chayil\אשת חיל – woman of virtue" by reading verses from Proverbs/Mishaley 31:10-31. Indeed, he acknowledges: "Batach bah lev ba'alah-בטח בה לב בעלה /in her confides the heart of her husband – veshalal lo yechsar-ושלל לא יחסר / and he lacks no good thing – g'malathu tov velo ra kol yemei chayeiah-גמלתהו טוב ולא רע כל ימי חייה / she is good not bad to him all the days of HER life" (Proverbs 31:2-3).

The Eastern Orthodox marriage celebration consists in two parts: the betrothal is followed by the wedding. The interesting point is that all the readings come back again and again to the fact that the bridegroom leaves his father and mother to cling to his wife. And these portions show the importance of the spiritual clutch that is set up, in one flesh – progressively into a new family whole. In contrast with the Roman Catholics who often celebrate a mass, the Byzantine tradition canceled the Liturgy a long time ago, considering that the new spouses are consecrating themselves, individually and to each other. There is also a cup of wine and the kiss. Strangely enough, people show very shy. It is the first "life" kiss. The last one is given during the burial of a dead person.

There is a tremendous paradox: Jews – and consequently the Christians – have described how womanhood saves humanity and manhood. Women pay a huge price for the sake of their identity and dignity. Male power and stubborn attitudes should first read the tradition they are sensed to apply or to confess as their faith. In acting with disregard, they somehow desecrate themselves. "No man can live without a woman, nor a woman without a man because both of them cannot live with the Presence of God (Shechinah\שכינה)." (Talmud Berachot 9:1).

av Aleksandr [Winogradsky Frenkel]

February 13/January 31, 2009 – deShvat 5769 - י"ט דשבט תשס"ט
יצירת אשה - shaping of woman

Monday, February 9, 2009

Voting: a spiritual commitment

Things are often too stiff, sharply "clear-cut" by our differences in Israel and also the Palestinian Territories. Israel has a long tradition of democracy. The Jewish and the Christian traditions require to PRAY for the leaders of Israel (of any State or nation governors in the dispersion and the Christian countries). It means that the believers ask and beg God to give some insights, discernment, intelligence to those who lead Israel or any state. "Giving a voice" to some individual and their staff is a full part of a personal spiritual commitment. We do not vote "against"; we do not elect representatives because we are afraid of a situation. Instead, we have to choose the right person who will plant and manage, correct and move forward, anticipate the future and fight for more equality, ethics, societal dignity and real diversity expressed in a State's unity. Of course, political commitments seem to be present everywhere. It is indeed a cultural tendency in the Middle-East.

A society/collectivity is responsible for its political and moral choices. We are together in this country of Modern State of Israel. It is a rather clear picture of blurred memories and fenced destinies that are complied to cope with so many colors and cultures.

There are times when a state and society do have the ad hoc political personnel. Sometimes, new ways are difficult to open up. Prophet Samuel could hardly think of David, a field-wandering shepherd. Who could imagine the life of King Solomon (rise and fall included)? What about Yehudit or Esther? Who spent some time in a pit, left away and sold by his brothers? Joseph acted with a true sense of insights and loving-kindness. All through the history of Israel since most ancient days of old, political events have been based on how the nation is or not able to meet with the Divine Mitzvot and rules proposed by the Talmud. The Church has developed and split by complying with the same attitudes.

In their history among the Nations, the Jews have developed remarkable capacities and competences in envisioning how to help and participate in the enhancement of the nations and States they were living for a short period or for many centuries. In the three past centuries this gave raise to some renown personalities in Europe and some other parts of the world.

Interestingly, the basements of the the Modern Hebrew State has its craddle in a very special area, namely "on a rope, the rope of Belorussia, Transcarpathia, Ukraine and the Baltic entities before World war I. Many came from a border line lining with the Habsburg Austrian-Hungarian empire and Romania. Most of the pioneers had been in close contact with the British and Commonwealth intercontinental culture and state philosophy. From Trumpeldor, Jabotinsky, Sharett, Ben Gurion, Weisman, the whole structure grew as shown in the Bible. Same cheating and same search for purity; same wandering around and wisdom then getting lost, alone, mistaken, helpless.

We need a political personnel who is capable to make sacrifices and work for the best of all inhabitants without exclusion. This statement has nothing to do with a political choice: it is at the heart of the Commandments. The major trend that may appear to be evident at the moment is that the whole of the country has lost their faith, morals, clutches to "dreams that must come true". Many seem just "blasé". The Avot (ancestors) had no time to be nonchalant, fed-up or uncaring. But they acted as tribal leaders and settlers. Kings David and Solomon had some specific views but got trapped by their own passions for idol-worshiping women or their appetites for power. Leaders must both be "appetizing" and people who carry out a task that is very close to some call. We see that with Barack Obama, Angela Merkel, some Scandinavian politicians. French Nicolas Sarkozy recently asserted that he was not the only possible candidate to be the French president and that, when his mandate will be over, he is convinced that other leaders may replace him.

When "Israel bocheret - ישראל בוחרת = Israel is voting, electing" the phrase includes many aspects that would be separated in a full secular society. Israel cannot be a full secular collectivity. Israel's eperience and government relies upon spirituality, even if the inhabitants would prefer to remove, forget about this for a few hours or a few days. On the eve of the election, these are calling to God, those to Moshiach now and others would consider that all these hair locks, Stetsons, yarmulkes and streimels should better dance in Tel Aviv or work with the Chinese in the fields or be good moshavnikim/kibutznikim and not obsessed by Sacredness.

What to do? When Israel votes, it "grows in her youth = bachur = young man/בחור. "I have made you a chosen one among the nations (Shabbat 105a; cf. Gen. 17:5). A "young man is unmarried, under test, ripening, being selected in order to be tried and purified" (Ketubot 7b). Are we never mistaken? Who can pretend we are not mistaken. On the contrary, before reciting the Vidui - confession prayer, the Jews insist that "they and their fathers had being mistaken". It is not much known. But it focuses on a move: there is a link between "being a chosen people whose call is to be tested in a spiritual way and en route to Good and Life and the act of proceeding to legal elections. In that sense, "beyt haBechirah\בית הבחירה = the House of Election (= growth, election, ripening) was the name of the Temple of Jerusalem in Megillah I, 72d).

When "Israel bocheret/ votes" the society is committing herself with spiritual challenge in view to enhance the development of the society as a whole. This challenge defies the ordinary citizens and is barely present in the media. Still, there is a confrontation in which Israeli society faces the heart of the Mitzvot and the Commandment, at least we will have to respond for the choice we will all make. In that sense, Israel - whatever up-to-date tendencies of "rampant racism and exclusion of the Israeli Arabs", appears as a very open and legal State. The society is tempted by mutual exclusion, a tendency that shows in numerous countries in the world. When Israel bocheret/Israel's voting also complies somehow with the Ten Paroles that command to include all the inhabitants without exception.

In times of incredible hardships, Israeli society is like a rainbow of all divine rules and Talmudic regulations inherited from the Sinai and down through history. The State exposes herself to be eventually betrayed by some of her citizens, though it is not sure that the traitors are those that are depicted and shown with some strong spirit of discomfort. Everyone in this country may not be able to reach full consciousness of what it means to be a member of the State of Israel, to live on this soil, to be accepted. The country is far too new as a free State, with far too much newcomers from all over the world to be able to fix with accuracy the rules that in other countries would immediately be condemned.

Either the residents get involved and are responsible for their decisions that cannot be reduced to their own interests or they put themselves aside, apart from the collectivity. Some people and group would prefer in order to avoid any commitment. It may not always be a mark of courage.

This week's reading portion is "Yitro". He is the pagan, non-Jewish father-in-law of Moses, the humble servant of God. Moses was overworked: he had to discuss with the people in the desert, under the tents night and day. It must have been quite an experience. Yitro advises his son-in-law to appoint "anshey chayil\אנשי חיל = men of value, moral credit and strong-minded". This has nothing to do with racing to the top. It means that the appointed men had both insights and courage, moral views.

It makes sense that such important election will take place in difficult times but the day after 15th of Shvat and the New Year of the Trees. Again, Israel bocheret = Israel's voting surpasses what may not be seen in our daily life and abroad. It is an act of confidence and piety that may allow the little tree to grow into a bigger and more open tree.

av Aleksandr [Winogradsky Frenkel]

February 10/January 28, 2009 - 16 deshvat 5769 - ט"ז דשבט תשס"ט
"Wrestling with the angel" allowed Jacob to reach his full "self". He never knew with whom he wrestled. A man? an angel? God? or his own mirrored image in the dark? We are the same. Our spiritual and mental enemies are worse than any devil."If Satan rise against himself and is devided he cannot stand, but has an end (Mk 3:26). Wrestling with the angel led to life. the sign: permanent wound, still a mark of courage and struggle for life.

Adulthood in kindergartens

This is the rejoicing time for planting trees and eating flavorful fruit. As we say before each reading of the Torah, "Blessed are Lord our God, King of the Universe / Who has given us the Torah of truth (Torat Emet\תורת אמת) and planted eternal life within us (vechayei olam nat'a betochenuוחיי עולם נטע בתוכינו)".

In some previous blogs, I discussed our flowing capacity to bear children in this country and in general in the Jewish tradition that is on a baby-booming mood. Little children are so sweet here and so essential because they are the next generation and will provide another next generation; this makes us always forward, ahead of any coming of the Messiah. "Yeled melech\ילד מלך" can be bleach, pale, reddish, fat-cheeked. They are generally spoiled, tremendously spoiled. Even when we have naught, they can get something out of it. The chutzpah (sort of very local and typical arrogant way of living) went too far at the present - children have been pampered to get on their own that they need real guidance, serious talks. Some others prefer to pamper their parents. All the segments of the society show, incl. among the pious Jews, that there is a strong need for paternal guiding presence and dialogue combined with motherly tenderness and munchies.

"Nat'a betochenu\נטע בתוכינו - planted among us" = 613 in Hebrew consonants that correspond to the number of all the Mitzvot. This is normal because the blessing is read on the Shabbat after the reading of the week portion. 13 years for boys (bar-bney mitzvah\בר-בני מצוה) 12 years for girls (bat-bnot mitzvah\בת-בנות מצוה) plus 1 (one) full day is the usual age when teens leave adolescence and their pimple spleeny or nice faces to take the yoke of the Mitzvot/Commandments.

There is also another option that is not always very sure: wait till your child is 83 years-old +1 full day since 70 is a traditional computation for many things in Judaism, also a normal life duration... so, 70 plus 13 years, you can offer a bar mitzvah gift to your parents or grandparents. They might be wiser than present-day 13-12 years-old teens, maybe not...

Thirteen is a mazel-מזל/fortune number. The 13 Middot HaAhavah\מידות האהבה are the 13 measures of Love. Real, full love: "HaShem, HaShem, El rachum vechanun\ה' ה' אל רחום וחנון - Lord, Lord, God of loving-kindness and merciful... (Ex. 36:6). Basically, it is said that Abraham became a monotheist at that age (Pirkey deRabbi Eliezer 26): he firstly saw the sun and worshiped it; then, he got a nap; at night, he saw the moon and decided to worship it instead; over the night, he realized that sun and moon alternate and understood that only the One God could manage that. So, he destroyed his father's idols. In the Second Temple, the Chachamim-חכמים/Sages seemingly used to bless the children who, at 12-13 years old could endure one full day of fast (Tractate Yoma 85). This might explain the presence of Jesus in the Temple (Luke 2:52), discussing with the Sages, which is quite frequent in the Jewish biographies of famous rabbis.

There were different writings that indicated to begin to study the Torah at 5 years-old, but the age of adulthood or the observance of the Commandments is not evident in the Talmudic tradition. "By ten utterances (ma'amarot\מאמרות) the world was created… to call the account of the lawless (resha'im\רשעים) who destroy the world and to give good "sachar tov\סכר טוב-salary/reward"to the righteous who invigorate (shemekaymin\שמקימין) the world and preserve it" (Avot 5:1). This verse is quite similar to the very first verse of Tehillim/Psalm 1:1. The combat is led between a righteous (tzaddik-צדיק) and a unfaithful (resha'-רשע).

This is why Tractate Yoma 82a insists on accomplishing the Mitzvot. On the other hand, a Tzaddik is on a move, that needs to be justified. No one was born a stiff righteous. There is no age nor specific celebration for becoming a bar mitzvah before the 15th century, except the acceptance to assume the Commandments and behave as a full adult. Traditionally, a bar mitzvah is, first of all, a subject of the Law (Talmud Bava Metzia 96a; cf. Galatians 4:4). This explains the releasing blessing pronounced by the father on that day: "Barukh She-patarani\ברוך שפטרני – Who released me from this day of any responsibility upon this one". On the contrary, since early times, a thirteen year-old Jewish son used to become responsible inside of the society, legally observing and eventually judged (Talmud Nedarim 5,6) according to the Law and marry (Tractate Kiddushin 16b) and be a member of a Beyt Din\בית דין (a court of justice) as shown when a "very young judge Daniel" saved the poor Susanna from death penalty, only in the Greek version of the Septuagint-Bible (Daniel 13:64).

This legal aspect is also accompanied by the requirement to don the tefillin\תפילין- phylacteries, the first commandment prescribed by the time of Exodus. They perfectly show that acts of loving-kindness (shel yad\של יד = tefillin put on the left arm/hand and close to the heart) are as important as the Love to God (shel rosh\של ראש = tefillin worn on the forehead). Some boys would be trained to don them some time before their 13th anniversary, but the Orthodox and Chassidic movements prefer to wait till the exact day is over. This also means that the young boy has overcome the trials he has experienced without yielding to the Yetzer HaRa\יצר הרע (Bad Impulse) and definitely chose to follow the Yetzer HaTov\יצר הטוב (Good Impulse).Teens and adolescents can be tempted by very strong undecided, hesitant and screwing impulses. They would tend to be good and may turn either foolish or basic instinct, blind lawlessness.

As regards "bat mitzvah\בת מצוה – daughter of the Commandment", the expression is only mentioned in Talmud Bava Kamma 15a about female obligations toward the respect of the Law. At twelve years plus one day, a girl is fully adult and responsible for her acts. Until very recently – it started in the United States – the celebration was really minor for a woman. She was considered as totally independent and normally did not depend on any parental or fraternal care. This has shown to be rather a dream throughout the Jewish history. On the other hand, married, divorced or widowed women have played a very important role in the Jewish society everywhere, in all rites. It may be considered as trendy if not "prophetic" that some Orthodox movements (Modern Orthodox, Chabad/Lubavitch, haredi to some extent) have accepted to develop the "bat mitzvah" celebration for women (they are precisely no more "girls").

Both Kiddushin 16b and Niddah 6,5 determine this age as the woman move from "childhood" to "civil responsibility", i.e. to the puberty life cycle that definitely modifies their mental and physical capacities and behaviors as b'not mitzvah/daughters of the mitzvah. The same applies to boys that become men, but the process can be slower and not show the same fulfillment of significant life changes. It is very important for Israeli young girls and women to feel and spiritually assume their own life. Interestingly, the modern "bat mitzvah" celebration was introduced at a time when women took more responsibilities in Jewish society. The example of Hannah Rachel Werbemacher (1815-92), woman talmudist buried at the Mount of Olives positively interrogates – beyond her specificity – the dynamics of Jewishness with regards to women status of being "fully subject to the Law".

Indeed, "bar mitzvah" means a clear understanding that innocence is not possible without God's reinforcing assistance. Judaism has known famous characters like the Besht (Baal Shem Tov), initiator of the chassidic movement whose soul and intentions were reputed as always "innocent". This corresponds to the morning prayers that states that "nishmati… taharah – my soul… is pure". The time of becoming responsible should imply that each boy read one full part of the weekly portion; i.e. to truly assume his aliyahעליה/to ascent to the bema-בימה/lectern, read the text and deliver a personal "drashah\דרשה" or comment of the text. This is definitely not the case in the present where the baaley keriah-בעלי קריאה/readers mostly function in place of the bney mitzvot. Since women often read the haftarah (weekly reading of the Prophets), this should allow to underscore the basic and essential call to be a woman at all levels, in the Jewish society, with all the moral involvements.

It would be very difficult to compare "Bar mitzvah adulthood" to any similar Christian celebration. It is important, on the other hand, to underscore that Jesus of Nazareth was fully a "subject of the Law" (Galatians 4:4). He was circumcised and underwent some "pedyion haben\פדיון הבן -redemption of the firstborn" (Luke 2:21-32) through the offerings made by his parents in the Temple. Then, he went down with his parents to Nazareth and was obedient to them… advancing in wisdom, age and favor before God and man (Luke 2:51-52). When he was twelve years-old, he went up to Jerusalem with his parents and was found in the Temple "sitting among the teachers listening and asking them questions" (Luke 2:41-50).

These similarities are important in order to avoid cutting Christianity from the Jewish way of being "subject of the Law". But the development of the Christian way to be a God believer mainly showed through various rituals: baptism and pouring of oils (oil of strength and faith then Holy Spirit). The Eastern Orthodox Church proceeds to these rituals in one time, never repeated. Say that an Orthodox Christian is born and "imprinted" (Gr. "sphragis", mark, seal) to behave consistently. The Western Churches have developed a more rational path with the "Receiving of the Communion in the shape of Bread and Wine") around 7-10 years-old and the confirmation (seal of the Holy Spirit) about 12 to 15 years-old. This depends on local customs.

Rites, times of our lives, passing-over dates create strong socializing ties. Everywhere they may untie souls and also show synchronic and diachronic impediments. All these times and delays curiously witness for our faith and requirement for God's assistance: "God delivered all humans to disobedience so that He may have mercy upon all" (Romans 11:32).

av Aleksandr [Winogradsky Frenkel]

February 9/January 27, 2009 – 15 deShvat 5769 - ט"ו בשבט תשס"ט


Yitro, the good father-in-law

The weekly reading portion "Yithro" is the happy end and restart of Shemot/Exodus - Part 1. Moses meets with Yithro, his father-in-law, his wife Zipporah and their two children, Gershom and Eliezer. The people of Israel were dwelling under tents and were meeting with Moses every day from the morning until sunset". "Vayeshev Moshe lishpot ha'am\וישב משה לשפוט העם - and Moses was sitting to magistrate the people, nation". The word has a large lexical scope. Its root is rather funny and diverting at first glance: "shafat\שפט = "to divide, decree, decide, judge, criticize", as "it was a generation that judged its judges" (Bava Bathra15b ) as " shifta\שיפטא (Aramaic) = childish" are linked to Aramaic: "patata\פטטא" = gossip, confusing speech, from "patat\פטט" = to break, to talk flippant.

The typical "patata\פטטא" example is when a person repeats things again and again, like in the Talmud: "God be with you" (Leviticus Rabba 32). It should be noted that actions that involve judging, deciding or ruling were viewed as the consequence, or at least, comparable to childlike and even childish activities. You know the same as when children play to be rulers, physicians in a hospital, lawyers - jobs that Jews love to exercise as professionals and after years of studies. The Oriental way of judging makes it also very vivid, psychedelic at times.

Moshe Rabbenu was a nice man. Very obedient to Yithro, his father-in-law, a pagan priest of Madian. Grandpa Yithro maybe considered as the first righteous among the nations. He saved Moses, gave him his daughter Zipporah. A thoughtful wife: she has proven to be an adult ever since they met and reminded her husband to circumcise their kids. This weekly portion is significant in many constant aspects that are essential for the spirit of Judaism : Shemot 18:1-20:23. The haftarot (prophetic readings) are from Isaiah 6:1-7.9:5.6(Ashkenazim, Yemenites); 6:1-13 (Sephardim).

Nowadays, we love sessions and run from one yeshivah to other meetings, workshops, video online conferences and discussions. This stress is utterly maddening and insane, what! Yithro had a serious talk with his son-in-law. Of course, it was normal at that time for people to meet constantly outside the tents; at least, Moses was sitting and "regulating" the situation. The result, by the way, can be even more profitable than all these online overseas video-meetings. Wilderness and oral culture people know how to resolve things much quicker than we do. But our ancestors could not eat properly, wash, pray or take care of their wives and children with normal refreshing kisses.

Thus, Yithro said to Moshe: "What is this that you are doing to the people? Why do you sit as a magistrate alone while all the people stand about you from morning from evening?" Moses replied: "It is because the people come to me to inquire of God. When they have a dispute, it comes before me, and I decide between one person and another, and I make known the laws and teachings of God (chukei HaElohim vetoratav\חוקי אלהים ותורתיו)" (Shemot 18:16). Yithro said: "You do not do the right thing; you will surely wear you out, and these people as well. For the task is too heavy for you; you cannot do it alone... You represent the people before God: you bring the disputes before God... You shall also seek out from among the people capable men - anshey chayil who fear God, trustworthy men who spurn ill-gotten gain. Set these over them as chiefs... let them judge at all times... make it easier for yourself by sharing the burden with you" Moses did so and heeded his father-in-law". This is the first major event in the process of management after the exodus. Frankly, Moses did not look like some self-centered, power-thirsty supreme guide. He just delivered the Israelites from the worse sort of despotic slavery and led them to freedom. Yithro introduced with Moses the rule that "courage"(sic) and "adult subject of the Law" qualifyfor freedom under condition of anonymity and the prejudice of others? This is a moral question right now among a lot of other related issues of co-responsibility. Prejudice and responsibility presuppose the existence of at least two people... free from bondage and "subject of the law", i.e. open.

But the point is to know to which laws and teachings Moses was referring during these long sessions. The question is that the Israelites - as Moses - never had experienced power or any ruling administration system. They just had fled from Egypt with Pharaoh's temporary consent. This has been an immutable law for the Jews throughout history to do things in accordance with the Nations' acquiescence. This does not rely upon any consent of Christians or Muslims, just Non-Jews. Cyrus of Persia - a pagan Messiah for the Jewish tradition - allowed the Jews to return to Jerusalem and rebuild the Temple. In 1947, in totally different conditions and the matter is still a slant, the United Nations agreed for the creation of the State of Israel, thus the return of the Jews to Eretz Israel. Thus, who counseled Moses to set up a "governing body of judges"? His father-in-law, the pagan priest of Madian, did. He was the second non-Jew, with Pharaoh's daughter, who had saved Moshe.

Moses chose "capable men = anshey chayil\אנשי חיל" as we have "eshet chayil\אשת חיל - women of virtue". Israel is not based on power or might. It is called to function with judgment, brains, wisdom, discernment between what is right or wrong, good or evil. Yithro showed that "governmental" capacities belong to natural Law and had been erased from the slaves' memory. On the other hand, God's free bond allows the Jews not to rule but exert justice. King (and Messiah) David, his son Solomon lost their minds and broke the seal of the Commandments by their ethical and spiritual misconducts. This shows that we are facing - maybe right now - the same problem: how society, disputes, judges and God can get to an agreement in order to comply with righteousness? Is it accidentally if a free State of the Jews only existed twice and for short periods.

Yithro's counsel to Moshe is still pending: to find the required "anshey chayil\אנשי חיל", those capable to regulate and administrate the people and bring forth true rectitude to the Nations. God's words are the same as in the wilderness: "All the earth is Mine, but you shall be to Me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation (mamlechet kohanim ve-goy kadosh\ממלכת כהנים וגוי קדוש" - Shemot 19:2-6).

Then Moses and the Israelites leave Yithro and come to Mount Sinai. They will hear and listen to the Ten Paroles/Divrot-דיברות. There is a special move that should be noted: Moshe was "judging" without any written law, but quoting God's teachings. The first Giving of the Ten Commandments is at the heart of the Jewish moral and spiritual attitudes between man and humans and humans with God. They ram all the Mitzvot into a compact way of living. God repeatedly addressed the humans and, in this portion, the Israelites with principles that are parallel to the Seven Noahide Laws. In the Ten Commandments, the two first were directly heard by all the Israelites. But the people were scared and Moses heard the other eight Paroles and transmitted them to the children of Israel. All the Commandments deal with justice and presuppose the existence of a "court - din/mishpat-דין\משפט". This is a major specification of the Noahide laws not to harm an animal and to judge in court.

In many places in the world, justice can be exercised either by professionals or by ordinary citizens or mixed courts/justices. They can refer to habits and customs or special laws, legal articles. The Sumerian civilization had developed the first known legal code of justice that deeply influenced the TaNaKh and the Talmud. Which system had been in use in Egypt, then in the wilderness? Oral Law that presupposed the compliance with a written law did not exist at that time for the Israelites. Or then, a wilderness oral (natural) law accompanied by the oral Giving of the Ten Commandments? "One thing God had spoken (achat dibber Elohim\אחת דבר אלהים); two things have I heard (shtayim-zu shama'ti\שתים-זו שמעתי (Psalm 62:12). This is what the Pirkey Avot\פרקי אבות (Sayings of the Fathers) confirms: Oral Law was given to Moses at the Sinai along with the Written One. For the moment, this week, we are in full oral speech which signals a birth point. Oral law is tracing back to "early ages if not primitive times" of basic wisdom and allow to sytematize, organize, regulate and govern with insights and not through the prism of blurring smokes.

The Oral Law has accompanied Judaism throughout its dispersion. The selection of the canonical books of the Bible have varied from the Jewish decisions at Yavneh (Jamnia) till the Early Church that spread and split into different jurisdictions and Creeds. The Oral Torah has poorly been comprehended by most Churches as a part of the Giving of the Law at the Sinai. The Eastern Orthodox Churches replaced it by the "Tradition of the (Christian) Fathers". But both the "Ten Paroles" and the Gospel have been preceded by a long time of oral teaching that it would be convenient to revitalize.

Moses, as Jesus of Nazareth, called their people not to be afraid: "al-tira'u\אל תיראו have not fear". Different sorts of fears (pachadim\פחדים) constitute a set of psychological symptoms that may alert us about our reactions to all the events we have to face or cope with. Dialogue is a way to cure this. God is One and cannot be divided. This Week corresponds to the difficult travail that set up a pagan priest and Moses to show how redemption can make sense in a society.

It should be noted that Moses always humbled himself and listened most of the people he encountered and gave him insightful advices. This is considered as a part of true faith. It implies that a person of faith is able to be open to opinions he would have thought of, not he had to hear them uttered by others. We live in a society of "services" and consultancy constitutes a big part of such professional activity. It may be very suspicious and dangerous. Many consultants and advisers only look for more profits. Most companies hire consultants that often drift them aside from a straight or consistent line or orientation. In times of great turbulence, discernment requires time, patience and some feeling for long-term resolutions.

This is also the key purpose of the weekly Eastern Orthodox reading about the Pharisee and the tax collector (a sinner). It is definitely very difficult to condemn the attitude of the Phariseee: he is just or explains how does follow the requirements of the Law. We often can hear a lot of true Christian who would justify their position the same way. Do they believe or not in God or who would dare say that God does not trust them?

The position of the tax collectors is different. He aliened himself as a tax collector and taking the money to hand it over to a foreign administration. Millions of souls are in such a tragic and very provocative human, political and social position. Thus, it is much more challenging to step down and ask for God's mercy. Just as Moses accepted to humble himself and be constantly assisted throughout his task.


av Aleksandr (Winogradsky Frenkel)

February 8, 2009 - 14 deShvat 5769 - י"ד דשבט תשס"ט